fidzu : Firebug

See the HTML panel options<[link]>
.
Sebastian

06 Feb 2012 12:25pm GMT

Thanks for clarifying this. Though you can do that even easier by using
Ctrl/⌘++ or Ctrl/⌘+Alt+Mousewheel Up, Ctrl/⌘+- or Ctrl/⌘+Alt+Mousewheel Downand
Ctrl/⌘+0 or Ctrl/⌘+Alt+Middle click.
For more info see the keyboard and mouse shortcuts<[link]>

06 Feb 2012 12:22pm GMT

Open the mini tab drop down menu (by clicking on the black triangle next to
the tab's label)
and uncheck: "Highlight Changes"
Does it help?
Honza

06 Feb 2012 12:22pm GMT

True, I can reproduce the problem, please create a new report here:
[link]
Honza

06 Feb 2012 12:19pm GMT

I am seeing:
page loading
script finishing
jquery ready
setTimeout
Click handler
Did you have the Console panel enabled when you loaded the page?
Sebastian

06 Feb 2012 12:15pm GMT

yes, this is known issue:
[link]
We are blocked by a platform bug:
[link]
Honza

06 Feb 2012 12:10pm GMT

I'm not quite sure what you mean with "directory for all the files", but I
guess you are talking about the Net panel<[link]>
.
If you're just talking of all script files or all CSS sources, please have
a look at the Location Menu of the CSS panel<[link]>or the Script

06 Feb 2012 12:09pm GMT

Open a context menu associated with Firebug start button (in Firefox
toolbar) and make sure that "On for All Web Pages" in unchecked.
Does it help?
Honza

06 Feb 2012 12:09pm GMT

Please create a new report here:
[link]
and I'll fix it. There should be a menu-item "Copy Posted Data" (or a
better label?) in the context menu.
But this works for me.
Honza

06 Feb 2012 12:05pm GMT

Could it be related to this report:
[link]
Here is related Firebug issue:
[link]
Honza

06 Feb 2012 12:00pm GMT

Could it be related to this report:
[link]
Here is related Firebug issue:
[link]
Honza

06 Feb 2012 11:58am GMT

I don't really get your point what's the big deal here. What I meant is
just a description of how to write a console wrapper, means how to use the console
API <[link]>of web development tools in general, means something like "Check, if the

06 Feb 2012 6:32am GMT

Then we should point them to these standard practices in our wiki.
You know, I used to think that wasn't our place. But now that you mention
it, I'm not so sure. Perhaps I'm wrong on that. But there is a big
responsibility for us if we link out. Something to think about.
Sebastian

06 Feb 2012 3:48am GMT

I also mentioned earlier, that it's basically not about checking, if
Firebug is installed, but if a specific 'console' object API exists.

The discussion of issue 5139<[link]>was not about detecting Firebug on the server side.

Well, that's not in our hand. Obviously there is a bunch of people out

06 Feb 2012 12:22am GMT

If i run some code from console of FB in previous version (1.8) I
could make breakpoints in TAB Scripts for such code in scripts with
names 1,2,3 e.t.c - and now in 1.9 i does not see any eval scripts.
How can i debug such code (made real-time in console of FB)

05 Feb 2012 4:48am GMT

Hello,

Please have a look at this behavior:
[link]

Is there an option to disable automatic highlighting of updates to DOM
when a selection has been made? Or even at all times (I'm ok with
enabling that highlighting again manually when I'm done playing with

04 Feb 2012 6:00pm GMT

Check this link where image shows how to zoom in the text of the
firebug so easy

[link]

04 Feb 2012 11:37am GMT

console && console.log("hi there")
or
console && console.log && console.log("hi there")
But really, if they have anything more than basic experience then they
write a console wrapper. And there are lots around on the interwebs.
Detecting something like that on the server is bad form. It takes the worst

04 Feb 2012 1:56am GMT

I don't understand why it's sometimes hard to explain you something obvious.
Not everybody agrees, that there should be no way for a website to detect
Firebug. These people want to have a simple way to get to know, if Firebug
is installed, so that they can use its Console API<[link]>for debugging.

04 Feb 2012 12:28am GMT

How can I see the directory for all the files on a site?

I did this on accident at one point, but can't figure out how to do it
now. When I did it the first time, another box popped up inside the
browser, over the main firebug window on the right-hand side.

Many thanks!

03 Feb 2012 7:48pm GMT

I don't understand how everybody can agree that there should be no way
for a Web site to detect Firebug and yet there follows a debate that
it should be be detectable.
jjb

03 Feb 2012 3:31pm GMT

OK, I see, thanks John!
Honza

03 Feb 2012 3:29pm GMT

Could be nothing. Back when we first started towards delayed opening,
I created a version of Firebug that was loaded dynamically, but I
could not figure out all of the issues. This file could be left over
from that experiment.
jjb

03 Feb 2012 3:23pm GMT

Related thread here:
[link]
Honza

03 Feb 2012 2:54pm GMT

So, I did at R12809 (but, not much happy with that)
Honza

03 Feb 2012 2:32pm GMT

Does anybody knows what the ModuleLoader is actually used for at the moment?
Honza

03 Feb 2012 12:23pm GMT

Ok, wrong word choice. Of course websites were meant. A user will
*probably* not use Command Line hacks or similar approaches to detect, if
Firebug is installed on his system. ;-)

Yes. That's exactly what Giovanni and I already said and I think everybody
agrees with that. The question is, if it should be easily detectable, if

03 Feb 2012 8:48am GMT

Giovanni is not correct. "Users" are not the issue. The issue is whether a
Web site can detect Firebug. If the Firebug Console and command line are
disabled, there should be no way for a Web site to run a script that
detects that the User has Firebug installed.
jjb

02 Feb 2012 4:02pm GMT

For the people, that did not follow the discussions: See issue 4395<[link]>and
4772 <[link]>.
In the following I am comparing Honza's statements with the ones of
Giovanni and comment on these opposite opinions:

02 Feb 2012 8:13am GMT

OK so, please file a bug in bugzilla describing what exactly should be done
and CC me.
I don't have much experience with the server setup but, how this would work?
I hope we don't have to file a bugzilla bug when we run out of the
predefined set of second level subdomains, correct?
(note that we don't have access to htdocs, but we do have access to the

02 Feb 2012 7:15am GMT